

Objectives:
Reference: §7.1 - 7.9 of Mechanics of Materials, 3rd Edition, Beer, Johnston, & DeWolf, McGraw-Hill
Definitions and Concepts: Suppose a structural member is under stress. At a point on or inside the material, the normal and shearing stresses can be computed by the methods presented in earlier chapters. For example, the normal stress may be a sum of the effects of a tensile force and a bending moment. The previous chapter (module) explained how to compute the horizontal shearing stress; you already knew how to obtain the vertical shearing stress from your Statics course and from the first chapter of the textbook. And section 1.11, page 23, explained that the shearing stress reaches a maximum at 45o when the forces are purely normal forces. But it's more complicated when the forces are not purely normal; now we consider what the stresses are if a small cubic element in the material is rotated. Section 7.2, starting on page 425, develops the equations for the normal and shearing stress for any such planar angle of rotation:

It is not too difficult to show (please see this explanation) that the equations above are the parametric equations of a circle (see equations 7.9 and 7.10 on page 428), with radius and position given as:

Please look at Figures 7.9 and 7.10 on
page 428.
(your
author, as usual, uses the incorrect abbreviation "ave" for average) is
the position of the center of the circle from the origin. The axes are
not x and y, but
.
When these are plotted (page 428, figures
7.9 & 7.10), the circle's center C is
from
the origin. Since the radius R can be calculated from the formula, point
A may be found by adding
and R; point B is found by subtracting R from
.
Note that these points represent the maximum and minimum values of the
normal stress, and a zero value for the shear. At some rotation angle
on
the circle shown by point M (representing an actual rotation angle of
of
the element), different values of the normal and shearing stresses apply;
your authors use primes to distinguish these from the other values. At
point D, the shearing stress is a maximum and the two normal stresses are
equal. You should not continue unless you understand these statements!
It's probably best to look at an example before considering any more theory. In Example 7.01 on page 431, two normal stresses and two shearing stresses are given (in practice, you would determine these by the methods of the previous chapters). Carefully note the signs! The 10 MPa is a compression! The two shearing stresses (on adjacent faces of the element) have to be equal and are positive in the directions shown; if you don't know why, return to the earlier discussions of shearing stresses on page 26.
Let's examine the values that are given to see what can be deduced from them. Since the normal stresses are not equal (50 MPa and -10 MPa), you know that point M (refer back to Figure 7.9) is not coincident with point D and the shear (40 MPa) is not a maximum value. Furthermore, the shear is not zero so M is not coincident with A, and the 50 MPa and -10 MPa are not principal values (maximum and minimum values).
Since M is not coincident with either D
or A, your authors first find the angle through which the element has to
be rotated (to obtain the principal stresses, which are the values on the
normal stress axis through the circle - points A and B on Figure 7.9).
There are two possible results: 26.6o and 116.6o.
Next, the text computes the maximum & minimum normal stresses from
the formula, getting 70 MPa & -30 MPa. Skipping over the check, in
part c we see that the text computes the maximum shearing stress (again
using the formula). Remember (from the circle)that the maximum and minimum
normal stresses are equal when the shearing stress is a maximum? This value
of the normal stress is
,
the coordinate on the horizontal (or normal stress) axis of the circle's
center.
Mohr's Circle: This is a geometric
method for doing the same analysis as above. Look at Figure 7.17 on page
437. To assure that the geometric method gives the same results as above,
we have to follow certain standards when drawing the circle. From Figure
7.17a, we have positive (i.e. tensile) normal stresses and a positive shearing
stress. Suppose we want to find the angle
(for
theta-sub-principal) through which the element must be rotated (counterclockwise)
so that the shearing stress is zero and the normal stresses are at their
maximum and minimum values (called the principal values). We set
up a circle where A and B are on the
axis
and are the maximum and minimum values, respectively (we don't know the
values yet, of course). We place X and Y on the circle at some angle which
is twice the desired angle
(in
accordance with the equations) and with point Y having the correct sign
for the shear (positive in this case, since our given shear value is positive).
(Or, you may use your text's method with point X - see the footnote
- "...when the shearing stress on a given face tends to rotate the element
clockwise, the point on Mohr's circle corresponding to that face is located
above the
axis."
For counterclockwise rotations, the point is below the axis.) Then
follow these steps:
Three-Dimensional Analysis of Stress: Until now, we have considered only two-dimensional rotations of the cubical element. Are there rotations into the third dimension that would result in even larger normal and shearing stresses? It turns out that there are, and since design has to be based on the largest values, the engineer must be able to compute them.
Consider Figure 7.28 on page 448. Suppose
we have already done an appropriate rotation about the c-axis to obtain
the principal values; let the circle representing this be the one shown
as BA in Figure 7.29. Suppose we now have
as
the maximum value, represented by OA, and
as
the minimum value (in this case also positive or tensile), represented
by OB.
is
R (half of BA); as we shall see, there are larger shearing stress values
possible.
Now with the cubical element having been
rotated about the c-axis by the appropriate amount so that there is a maximum
normal stress from this rotation, we have new axes x and y in place of
a and b.
is
now zero, but there may be shearing stresses on the other faces of the
cube that are not zero.
was unaffected by this rotation. If we now rotate the cube about the y-axis
by an appropriate amount so that
becomes
a
(a minimum
value), this would plot as point C in Figure 7.29.
will be unaffected by this new rotation; that's still point B on the first
circle. Taken together, these two circles can be used to define a third
(outside) circle representing a rotation about the third (x) axis. Then
it's easy to pick off the largest possible shearing stress.
Example 7.03 on page 450 uses a first rotation
about the z-axis to obtain the principal values of the normal stress, 8
and 1.5 ksi. These are plotted in Figure 7.37; OB = 1.5 ksi. Considering
a second rotation about the b-axis (Figure 7.36), your text says: "Since
the faces of the element which are perpendicular to the z-axis are free
of stress...". I would be more specific by saying: "Since the faces of
the element which are perpendicular to the z-axis are free of shearing
stress, these faces are principal planes (remember that zero shear means
we have max & min normal stress). Thus we can plot circle OB. Finally,
we can plot circle OA and find
geometrically.
You should read section 7.6 carefully, concentrating especially on Figures 7.30 and 7.32.
Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials
under Plane Stress: As your text states, simple tension (Figure 7.38
page 451) is easy;
,
perhaps with the inclusion of an appropriate safety factor. A test can
be made on the material using one of the standard testing machines. But
as soon as the force is applied differently, such as a beam in pure bending
(Figure 7.39a), a state of plane stress exists and the Mohr's circle method
should be used to determine the maximum values. Since the maximum normal
stress is not oriented along the beam's axis (Figure 7.39b), it is not
possible to make predictions directly from experimental tests; i.e.,
cannot
be applied experimentally at the angle shown.
The Maximum-Shearing Stress Criterion
is based on the fact that, in ductile materials, failure occurs along oblique
surfaces (we have seen, for example, that the shear is a maximum at 45o
for simple axial forces). Remembering that this section is restricted to
plane stress, Figures 7.29 and 7.32 apply. So if
is
less than
the
specimen is safe (see Figure 7.30; half the diameter is the maximum shear).
Likewise, if the values of the normal stress are all positive (Figure 7.32),
the shearing stress must be less than
.
Putting this another way,

When these are plotted, we get Tresca's
hexagon (Figure 7.40, page 452). The specimen is safe if a point represented
by coordinates
falls
within the hexagon.
The Maximum Distortion Energy Criterion depends on the determination of the distortion energy in the specimen. In section 11.6, we shall discuss how to compute the distortion energy per unit volume (equation 7.25 page 452). In this case, the specimen is safe provided the stress coordinates fall within the ellipse shown in Figure 7.41 (page 452).
You may want to study Example 2 and Example 3.
Thin-Walled Pressure Vessels:
Cylindrical Pressure Vessels - I'll use subscripts of h (hoop) and L (longitudinal) in place of the textbook's "1" and "2". Please refer to Figure 7.51 (page 462) to see the directions of

In the following formulas, r is the tank's inside radius, t is the wall thickness, and p is the gage pressure; i.e., the amount that the inside pressure exceeds atmospheric pressure outside the tank:

A Mohr's circle analysis shows that the maximum shearing stress equals (numerically) the longitudinal stress:

Spherical Pressure Vessels: Both perpendicular normal stresses are equal, and the maximum shearing stress is half of either:

Here's an example that will help you understand the use of these formulas.
1From the 2nd Edition of Beer & Johnston's Mechanics of Materials, here's a jingle that may help: "In the kitchen, the clock is above, and the counter is below."